Get A Brazilian In Brampton On

Buying peace?

Santiago González

A large rally yesterday toured the streets of Madrid to demand that ETA is not present at the election next 22-M. was a demonstration trial. Normal. After May 22 only would the use of the complaint. Before the announcement yesterday, the government and his party had put profile: waived its jurisdiction to register or refuse registration of the new brand of Batasuna and the Supreme Court endorsed. From there it is understood that the expression ceased to be a demand the government to be intolerable pressure on the Supreme. Only the victims, eye. Does not appear that any socialist leader has expressed qualms similar to the demonstrations called by the nationalist left in Bilbao on 19 February and 2 April and catches the attention the double standards to comply with the order of the Supreme and vindicate the dissenting votes at the same time. Blow and suck, its fallacies necessarily lead to aporia. Let's be lenient with the problems of government. The anticipated Montesquieu in his wonderful book 'The rise and fall of the Romans': "The mistakes made by men of the State (...) are often necessary consequences of the situation in which they are; and disadvantages give rise to other problems. "

What is at stake is important. Not only because the councils are an important logistical base and ensuring public money for their future mobilizations, but especially so because it elucidates the story that has to be after so many years of disgrace, so much fear, so much bloodshed.

Victims know that peace without defeat for the terrorists is to tie Azkoitia: Pilar Elías experience to take the back of his house glassware murderer of her husband, whose wife complained about the irrelevance of the victim hold his gaze, "is that this lady has no humility." There is a quid pro quo, as there was no post-war par excellence, the Second World War. Peace was a big challenge for a Europe exhausted, no doubt, but only if it was preceded by the defeat of Nazism. Eisenhower refused to see the general until he was Jodl signed the unconditional surrender. Then entered the room and without preamble, asked Have you understood the terms of unconditional surrender and are willing to meet them? Jodl stood up, saluted and nodded. That was it.

is only an analogy, but worth to understand the reasons for the victims: not without dissolution of ETA, but not to assume that the history of ETA is the expression of evil that sometimes emerges in the history of mankind: Therefore it must be defeated and condemned its history. The bargaining model of the Indian pirates can not be the boss to buy peace with ETA. We also explained in the work cited Montesquieu: "Sometimes the cowardice of emperors, other weakness of the Empire, drove to buy with money to the people who threatened to invade. But peace can not be bought, because who has sold thus is better able to make it back to buy it ... "