Receiving Garzón demand against the Supreme Court for violating their rights, the European Court of Human Rights must have had mixed feelings. A first and very noticeable because the demand sent by Garzon to Strasbourg, apparently was not signed. It is unlikely to return it to remedy such a lamentable absence. Draws much attention may have had this oversight, a man who did not forget to sign any letters sent from New York Dear Emilio regarding the funding of its courses. In one of them could say that sobrefirmó, add your name to "magistrate-judge National Court, so far from its jurisdiction and so without apparently come to mind.
Secondly, so catching the issue: a claim that arises in a trial so obviously, they have no judgments of the TS that has injured a right of Baltasar Garzón. Third, much has had to sonarles name. Baltasar Garzón Real is the only European judge whose actions have led two sentences of the Strasbourg Court against Spain. The first, demand Huidobro Rafael Vera, former Secretary of State for Security. Spain was condemned for lack of impartiality subjective judge, that is, Baltasar Garzon. If the instruction was saved because the GAL case reach the Supreme Court, Judge Moner instruction Garzón pulled over and started a new one from scratch. Well, from scratch, no, there was evidence that they were on Garzón instruction and hopefully they were not contaminated by it, because in that case, the lack of impartiality subjective become objective.
The second conviction occurred on February 8 and condemned Spain for not investigating the allegations of torture raised by Aritz Beristain, arrested in San Sebastian on September 5, 2002, transferred to the Audiencia Nacional, Baltasar Garzon ordered where he went to prison. Who give no more.
And now, the Gürtel case, which began badly, with Garzon ordered the arrest of Francisco Correa and collaborators Pablo Crespo and Antoine Sanchez, February 6, 2009. He was arrested Friday and remained in maceration over the weekend, as the 'accused', as the judge was going to hunt and dinner at Andújar with the Minister of Justice, Bermejo, the commissioner general of the Judicial Police, Juan Antonio Delgado González and tax.
Judge TS Alberto Jorge Barreiro, one of the most prominent members of the legal left, said the opening of the trial with a strict order on the performance of superjuez to intercept conversations between defendants and their defenses at the expense of them. "I was indifferent" that the talks had no other content that defense strategies. The article said 51.2 of the General Penitentiary, " of internal communications with counsel (...) will be held in appropriate departments and may not be suspended or operated except by order of the judicial authority and cases of terrorism. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment